uhh huh. ill try i guess. however there are some pieces of "art" that are either so bad they should be deleted or are pointless or send the wrong message, or are just ill conceived. i would think a proper art creator would want to know that some or more people disagree with his/her art. like for instance, a cam whore with her pussy out laying on a basic bed(not really art in anyway, just porn.) however take same cam whore, keep her naked but add some setting other than just splayed out on a bed, like naked in a river or naked taking a bath, or naked in front of a mirror, it has the possibility of surpassing porn and becoming art if done right and with care.
it is those pieces of art that i want to see thrive on DA, not the porn pics that are called "art", or the pics that have suggestive material of an obscene nature, which in rare circumstances(like great skill that surpasses the obscenities that might be present) obscene pieces of art can have a message or significance that makes them better than the average piece of crap art.
basically what i am trying to say is there is a fine line between art and junk/garbage/filth/obscenity, and it is a balance to be in between that edge and stand above the rest, and usually it takes great skill but it can also be done with a great message or premise. it isnt an exact science but cant be replicated with emotional work that is made with care and done delicately.
that is why i normally critique certain pieces of art is because they go past this balance i refer to and in my opinion are no longer artwork worthy of DA. however i am just one opinion, i could be wrong, but i normally take more care in what i critique than the "artist" took in making their junk.